The Future's So Bright...
Who Benefits?
The big winners of Private Investment Accounts
The big winners of Private Investment Accounts
George W. Bush’s plan to privatize Social Security has nothing to do with enhancing workers’ retirement income. Rather, it is a scheme to redistribute money from the majority of people who work to the minority of people who own the banks and brokerage firms.It just figures, doesn't it? I mean, really. And you know what else reeks about it? They decry social programs because of "redistribution of wealth." Yeah, right. They just want to "redistribute" it into their own coffers.
A worker retiring in 2042 after having earned average compensation would ordinarily receive about $20,000 a year in Social Security benefits. If nothing at all were done to offset a Social Security Fund shortfall due in 2042, and all future benefits were paid to that worker out of payroll taxes at the time, that worker would still receive approximately $18,000 in benefits. With the Bush plan, that same worker would have his benefits reduced to less than $15,000 a year, according to the center’s analyses.
So who are the real winners here? The answer is clear: Big Finance.
4 Comments:
The proposal that is out there is completely voluntary. If you want to not put any of your money into these accounts, you don't have to.
This is so looney! Have you ever heard of annuity?
You guys have GOT to start thinking!
You would think Bush had done something in the past 4 years to benefit low income earners.
Jack by the way, enjoy the other liberal blogs. At least this blog doesn't claim to be anything it isn't.
Just to respond to this:
"Couple of things to note:
1. There is no such thing as "the fiscally conservative liberal left"--there is no such thing as "fiscally conservative ANYTHING" in government now.
2. Beware activist judges. Judicial activism is unconstitutional and dangerous. You are advocating autocracy.
3. The frivolous doesn't matter."
Lighten up.
Post a Comment
<< Home